This information was compiled for a local school board after one of the school board trustees requested more information on the legitimacy of Covid-19. Use this information to inform your family, friends and neighbors of what the facts are of Covid-19. What the authorities say in their own words.
This information was compiled for a local school board after one of the school board trustees requested more information on the legitimacy of Covid-19. Use this information to inform your family, friends and neighbors of what the facts are of Covid-19. What the authorities say in their own words.
"Deaths...were due to pneumonia, influenza, and COVID-19..."Percentages of deaths due to pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19" https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm - Pg11
"Due to the impact of COVID-19 on ILI surveillance, and the fact that the state and territorial epidemiologists report relies heavily on ILI activity, reporting for this system will be suspended for the 2020-21 influenza season. Data from previous seasons is available on FluView Interactive." CDC Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm- Pg 11
After tracking for many decades, why did the CDC stop tracking Influenza in the middle of this year (2020)? Could it be because they could not report both statistics honestly and still justify the Covid-19 pandemic? Or possibly Covid-19 can not be isolated different from Influenza?
"Diagnostic tests (typically involving a nasopharyngeal swab) can be inaccurate in two ways. A false positive result erroneously labels a person infected, with consequences including unnecessary quarantine and contact tracing." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2015897 - Pg 2
"Use of either known positive or contrived samples may lead to overestimates of test sensitivity, since swabs may miss infected material in practice." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2015897 - Pg 3
"...measuring the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 tests in asymptomatic people is an unsolved problem that needs urgent attention to increase confidence in test results..." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2015897 - Pg 3
"In a preprint systematic review of five studies involving 957 patients (“under suspicion of Covid-19” or with “confirmed cases”), false negatives ranged from 2 to 29%. However, the certainty of the evidence was considered very low...Taken as a whole, the evidence, while limited, raises concern about frequent false negative RT-PCR results." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2015897 - Pg 3
"It is important to note that test positivity is a measure of testing capacity and while it can provide important context about case totals and trends, it is NOT a measure of how prevalent the virus is in communities. Policy decisions, like openings and closings or interstate travel, should not be determined based on test positivity alone." https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/differences-in-positivity-rates - Pg 1
"In the U.S., there are no federal standards for reporting COVID-19 testing data. This makes it impossible to offer a fully apples-to-apples view of testing data at the national level. Without federal standards, States have been left to forge their own paths, and as a result, they report testing data differently." https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/differences-in-positivity-rates - Pg 1
"Some States also periodically pause or fully stop sharing key data that are used in making positivity calculations, or change the cadence with which they report data. Both of these actions can create abnormal spikes in positivity rates in tracking efforts such as ours." https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/differences-in-positivity-rates - Pg 2
"Depending on how States report data on the number of people tested (e.g., whether they deduplicate data for each person tested), calculating positivity using Approach 4 may not capture repeat tests performed on the same person." https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/differences-in-positivity-rates - Pg 7
"SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and [the] viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2004973 - Pg 1-2
"Our results indicate that aerosol and fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is plausible, since the virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days (depending on the inoculum shed)." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2004973 - Pg 3
"The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to death certifiers on proper cause-of-death certification for cases where confirmed or suspected COVID–19 infection resulted in death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf - Pg 1
"In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely, it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf - Pg 2